Why write a research paper without using Wikipedia

When writing academic material, there is a condition of referencing content borrowed from other researchers. This gives credit to researchers for their contribution to the subject. It is also important that the writer does not get credit for work that he has not sought. As such, it is important for researchers to mention the various works they use in their papers not only for credit for their work, but also for their credibility when carrying out. write an essay. The referencing aspect is crucial and requires that the material be used in particular for scholarly content. Sources should be carefully selected to reflect quality research practices. Wikipedia is one of the most widely used sources and while it may contain credible information, it should not be used for academic purposes.

Edited by any user

The first red flag associated with Wikipedia as a source is the fact that it can be edited by anyone. This means that the element of selecting the right people to edit website content is not available. As such, the chances of having information properly verified for the truth in the matter are very likely. As such, there are chances of having inaccurate accounts of the content, which, when used, will represent poor research and larger misinformation. When SEO, it is important to note that an article is only as solid as the sources that were cited in the completion of the article. When sources such as Wikipedia are used, it means that the information is weak and could easily be inaccurate.

Research ethics

When writing a research paper in an academic setting, there is an element of ethics that researchers should take into account. This is associated with authority in the matter. There are academics who have written articles and research papers in the field of study and as such have significant authority in the field. Using their work in a research paper adds to the authority they carry with them. This is the same case as the one mentioned above about credibility. With the authority the researchers have brought to the article, the material is more consistent and above all accurate.

When using Wikipedia, it is important to note that this is a source that offers a general overview of the topic in question. As such, it does not offer researchers specific material. Rather, it is a collaborative source of information from different users on the subject. Citing actual research papers that were done by former researchers is more credible than relying on hearsay from a website that accumulates opinions on the topic based on what they have read from others. sources. Therefore, when researchers use Wikipedia, it should only be for the background information they need to better understand what the subject is about before they can then limit themselves to previous academic papers that have been published in reputable journals.

Interpretation of content

There is an element of lack in the interpretation of the content that the source presents and a personalized research paper writing service and similar companies are very enthusiastic about it. This is related to the fact that Wikipedia presents the facts as they have been mentioned in other sources and accumulated by the consensus of the users. However, this lacks the interpretive value that learners need to be able to better understand the content when interacting with the material. There is a very important level of understanding that is required when it comes to learning. As such, the lack of interpretation of the material presented makes the source unreliable for learning. Having the facts presented the challenge of getting the interpretation and therefore the application again.

Founder’s advice

Ironically, even the site’s founder, Mr Wales, pointed out that it should not be referenced for academic papers such as school essays and research reports. In its interview, Wales’s points out that the site only offers previews of content reviewed by researchers. It does not offer the correct position, so searchers should be very careful when using the source. He also clarifies that, for students, this is only a source to give them the guideline in the content they are looking for. However, he is quick to point out that some information is not properly researched and has been included by users on the site. As such, it is crucial for researchers to ensure that research comes from other reliable sources and to ensure the accuracy of the information they can collect from Wikipedia records. It also points out that this is an encyclopedia and not an academic source that can be used for research purposes such as essays and research reports. Rather, students should never locate the source unless instructed by teachers to do the same. To get correct information, researchers should be careful to research content from primary and secondary sources.

Conclude

In conclusion, Wikipedia is a source of important information. However, it is compromised in several ways and as such cannot be used as an academic source. This includes the fact that it can be edited by anyone, has little research focus, misinterprets the content, and even the founder advises users not to use it as an academic reference.




Source link

Comments are closed.